Contents
Contents
SEC Form TCR records a whistleblower’s account of possible securities violations and the evidence behind it. You may know why a customer order moved into an earlier quarter, why an investor’s money went to a different account, or who changed the number before it reached a public report. The useful connection is between what you saw inside the business and what the documents let investigators check.
This page explains the form’s factual questions and the records behind an SEC whistleblower report. Our page on reporting securities fraud to the SEC covers the broader reporting decision, while the corporate records trail follows the transactions behind the allegation. Here, the focus is how your knowledge gives those records meaning.
Form TCR is the SEC’s Tip, Complaint or Referral form for information about possible violations of federal securities laws. The SEC whistleblower complaint form brings together the conduct, the people and businesses involved, supporting material and the whistleblower’s declarations. The SEC also receives whistleblower information through its online TCR system.
Eligible SEC whistleblowers can receive 10% to 30% of monetary sanctions collected when their information leads to a successful SEC action ordering more than $1 million in sanctions. We assess the connection between your information and the enforcement result with you as part of your whistleblower case.
The SEC’s Form TCR asks what happened, when it began, which people or entities were involved and which investment or security the complaint concerns. It also asks about your relationship to the business, earlier communications with the SEC or other organizations, and reports made inside the company.
The form also contains a whistleblower declaration about the truth, accuracy and completeness of the information to the best of the whistleblower’s knowledge, information and belief. It has eligibility questions and a separate counsel certification where applicable. We work through those issues with you and SEC whistleblower counsel, alongside the evidence itself.
Useful evidence connects a specific securities transaction or representation to the records and people behind it. The SEC’s whistleblower FAQ says specific, credible and timely tips are more likely to reach investigative staff, particularly when they identify participants, particular transactions or nonpublic evidence. An insider’s explanation can connect a figure investors saw to the decision that produced it.
The SEC distinguishes independent knowledge, facts you know from sources that are not public, from independent analysis, an examination of information that reveals something not generally known. That analysis can draw on public material. We examine what your knowledge or analysis adds to the evidence, with SEC whistleblower counsel handling the eligibility questions.
A public company’s reporting chain runs from transactions through accounting entries, estimates and the financial close to the statements and signed certifications. A sales employee may know what the customer actually agreed to. An accountant may know which entry reached the ledger, and someone in disclosure review may know which explanation reached investors. We connect those views of the same transaction.
The document checklist follows the business activity:
The explanation matters beside each record: what it concerns, who made the decision, when it happened and how you know. We examine the connection between that information and the statement or transaction at issue. Questions about lawful access or anonymity belong in that conversation with our experts and SEC whistleblower counsel.
The SEC’s settled order concerning Under Armour describes an evidence trail running from internal forecasts to customer orders and public statements. The agency alleged that the apparel company accelerated orders customers had requested for later quarters to meet analysts’ revenue estimates, without telling investors how much its growth depended on that practice. This is the kind of sales timing and disclosure question that an employee in finance or sales can recognize.
According to the SEC’s account, senior management directed financial planning and sales personnel to find orders that could ship early. The SEC said the company periodically offered discounts and extended payment terms to persuade customers to accept those shipments. The order reproduces an executive’s internal email acknowledging what the earlier acceleration had done to later sales:
The issue is that we pulled forward a lot in Q4 and there is not as much room in Q2 but we will see.
The SEC alleged that Under Armour publicly credited product demand and brand strength while omitting the significant effect of the accelerated orders. In that account, we see the delivery calendar doing some of the selling.
For someone who handled those orders, the original requested delivery date, the request to accelerate shipment and the terms offered to the customer belong beside the public explanation. Your role may let you explain why the timing changed and who authorized it. That is a concrete connection between an internal decision and the information investors received.
An insider can explain a transaction that appears only as an entry or a total to someone outside the business. A study of occupational fraud, The Significance of Whistleblowing as an Anti-Fraud Measure, published in the Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting in 2018, examined fraud-examiner survey data. It found that schemes involving more perpetrators were more likely to be detected through whistleblowing.
The person who approved the transaction, the person who recorded it and the person who handled the customer’s response can explain different parts of it. We work with you to connect what you personally know to the documents and other people who can corroborate it.
The SEC accepts additional information after an initial TCR, and its submission guidance connects later material to the original submission number. If you have already reported and now have more information, we assess what it adds to the account already given. A later record may clarify a transaction, identify another participant or connect an internal instruction to the public statement.
Corrections to the form, declarations and earlier reporting history need their own review with our experts and SEC whistleblower counsel. We connect the original account and its attachments with the information added later, examining what each contributes. The same care applies when several people have information about the same conduct.
Form TCR supplies the initial information about possible securities violations. Form WB-APP is the separate application for a whistleblower award. The award form asks for the original tip’s number and date, and the relevant Notice of Covered Action. Our page on the connection between your information and an award claim covers that separate question.
A whistleblower case under the False Claims Act can pay 15% to 30% of what the government recovers. That is a separate kind of case brought on the government’s behalf. An SEC TCR supplies information to the agency, and Form WB-APP concerns an SEC whistleblower award.
The SEC’s Enforcement Division reviews incoming tips, and its Office of Market Intelligence identifies information that warrants further investigation. The SEC also says new information can significantly contribute to an investigation already underway.
That makes the account of what you know useful beyond the opening report. A document’s meaning, the people involved and the connection to a particular transaction can remain important as investigators examine the conduct. We stay beside you as that evidence develops.
If you can explain the order, transfer or accounting decision behind what investors were told, speak with our whistleblower experts about that evidence. We build the connection between your knowledge and a securities whistleblower case, bring in SEC whistleblower lawyers who understand the conduct, and stay beside you through the process.