Contents
Contents
Our whistleblower experts help you work out how to report a suspected Ponzi scheme to the Securities and Exchange Commission. We connect what investors were promised to what happened to their money. You may handle the account that funds distributions, maintain the investor ledger or hold statements that tell a different story from the sales pitch. That is where our conversation starts.
This page focuses on the money trail behind a suspected Ponzi scheme and what an insider or investor can explain about it. Our securities fraud reporting page covers the broader SEC reporting process, while the examples here show why the source of each payment matters.
A Ponzi scheme uses new investor money to pay earlier investors while misrepresenting how the investment earns its returns. Money raised from another investor is presented as money earned by the investment.
The cash flow behind those payments connects the sales promise, the business’s actual income and the account funding distributions. For someone working inside the business, that means looking beyond the return printed on an investor statement. We want to understand which receipts funded that payment and who decided how investors would be told about it.
An investor may hold the sales communications and statements showing what was promised and what was reported as earned. An employee may know how the payment was booked or which account supplied it. We connect those views to the underlying transactions, so the suspected scheme becomes something investigators can examine.
Useful Ponzi scheme evidence connects a specific representation with a specific movement of money. Offering documents and sales communications describe the investment investors thought they were buying. Bank records, investor ledgers and business receipts can show what funded the distributions they received.
An investor statement records the balance and return represented to the customer. The bank transaction identifies a payment and its destination. The records behind the reported number matter together, along with the person who can explain how the business produced that number.
We work out with you what you hold, where the rest sits and how you know it. Knowing where a payment instruction or account record sits can help connect your firsthand knowledge to evidence elsewhere in the business.
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s whistleblower FAQ says specific, credible and timely information is more likely to reach investigative staff. It points to particular fraudulent transactions and nonpublic materials as useful details. We help make those connections clear: what you saw, how you know it and which transaction or document allows someone else to test it.
The dates we work through are the dates of the conduct: the pitch, the investment, the transfer and the explanation that followed. We tie that sequence to the records you know and discuss evidence preservation with you and securities fraud whistleblower counsel. Your account of what happened supplies the context that a spreadsheet alone cannot.
In its December 2023 account of the Agridime complaint, the Securities and Exchange Commission described a business claiming to specialize in meat sales, distribution and animal supply chain management. The complaint alleged that the defendants used at least $58 million of new investor funds to make payments to earlier investors. For someone handling those payments, the question is which incoming funds supplied them. We see the next investor doing the job the cattle business was supposed to do.
A bank report helped expose the gap between the investment story and the business account in a case FinCEN published in June 2001. A Michigan bank filed a suspicious activity report concerning an associate of the operator, and the IRS began an investigation. The report described allegedly fraudulent satellite-service contracts and identified a business involved in the supposed offshore investment activity.
FinCEN’s account of the operator’s criminal guilty plea says he admitted promising secure overseas investments while putting investors’ money into that business’s account. He used funds from the account to buy vehicles for himself or friends and paid salesmen who recruited more investors. If you know the account or the recruiting payments, we can connect that knowledge to what investors were told. We see a car-buying plan dressed as an overseas investment.
Research on occupational fraud shows how much detection can depend on someone speaking up. In The Significance of Whistleblowing as an Anti-Fraud Measure, published in the Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting in 2018, the study’s complete-data sample contained 4,943 frauds. Whistleblowers detected 35.9% of them, compared with 21.4% detected through internal controls.
The study also found that whistleblowing was more likely to be the principal detection method as the number of people involved in the fraud increased. For the suspected Ponzi scheme you bring us, the useful question is which part of the transaction your position lets you explain: the promise, the incoming investment, the payment or the instruction connecting them.
The Securities and Exchange Commission receives reports of suspected Ponzi schemes involving securities, and we assess the reporting route with you from the investment and the conduct. Its whistleblower guidance expressly includes Ponzi schemes among the possible violations it investigates.
The same records can matter to more than one authority. We work out where they belong with you and securities fraud whistleblower lawyers as part of assessing your case.
SEC Form TCR is the Securities and Exchange Commission’s form for a tip, complaint or referral about possible securities-law violations. We address the reporting requirements and the separate whistleblower award application with you and securities fraud whistleblower counsel.
Eligible whistleblowers in a qualifying Securities and Exchange Commission action share 10% to 30% of the monetary sanctions collected. The qualifying SEC action must result in sanctions exceeding $1 million. The reward follows information that helps produce successful enforcement, including information that significantly contributes to an existing investigation.
The False Claims Act addresses fraud against the government. A whistleblower case under the False Claims Act can pay 15% to 30% of what the government recovers.
Questions about anonymous reporting, confidentiality, an earlier internal report or a company agreement belong in that conversation with us. We work through those questions with you and securities fraud whistleblower counsel in the context of your role, your information and your reporting history.
Ponzi scheme victims may have recovery claims, and those claims are separate from reporting the conduct or seeking a whistleblower award. We discuss the distinction with you when your own money is part of the story.
Your investment records speak to what you paid and what you received. Your knowledge of the operation can also speak to how other investors’ money moved and what the business told them. The investment loss, whistleblower award and investor recovery each answer a different question, even when the same person has evidence relevant to all of them.
If you know why investor payments depended on fresh deposits, or hold records that contradict the investment pitch, speak with our whistleblower experts about the money trail. We build the case with you around the accounts, representations and decisions you can explain, and bring in securities fraud whistleblower lawyers who understand investment schemes. We stay beside you through the reporting and award process.