Contents
Contents
FCPA whistleblower questions about eligibility and rewards start with the information you can contribute about foreign bribery or false accounting. The Securities and Exchange Commission can reward information that helps it bring a successful enforcement action. You may know why a consultant received a commission, what a customs broker’s fee bought, or which internal warning disappeared from the final report. Those details can connect an ordinary business expense to the decision someone bought.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act reaches corrupt offers, promises, authorizations and payments of value to foreign officials to obtain or retain business. Its books, records and accounting controls provisions also address how public companies record transactions and control their assets. The Justice Department and SEC’s Resource Guide explains both sides of the law.
The companies involved can be American or foreign. The law covers U.S. businesses, companies with U.S.-listed securities or SEC reporting obligations, and certain other foreign businesses acting in the United States. The local subsidiary, its parent and the intermediary may each hold part of the approval and payment history.
The business benefit might be a government contract, an import permit or border clearance. Money can move through an agent’s inflated commission, a consulting invoice for work never performed or a reseller’s discount that the customer never receives. Travel, a job for an official’s relative or a payment to a favored charity can also supply the benefit. The commercial question is what the company was buying and who could deliver it.
A foreign official may work inside the customer. A public-hospital purchaser or an employee of a state-controlled business can hold the decision that a supplier wants. In health care, prescribing and purchasing decisions can put public money behind a supplier’s sales.
The SEC’s hospitality order illustrates the records behind that relationship. It alleged that BHP Billiton’s Olympic hospitality applications omitted invitees’ government roles and pending business dealings. It also described a mining minister’s invitation that was not reconsidered when permit negotiations began. The case resolved accounting and controls allegations, making the invitation forms and approval process central to the story.
Yes. The SEC receives whistleblower information from outside the United States, as its fiscal year 2025 report confirms. An overseas employee, agent or supplier may know the local recipient, the service supposedly purchased and the reason a payment was requested.
The person approving the money, the intermediary receiving it and the official controlling the decision can sit in different countries. Your knowledge can connect those parts of the transaction. We discuss cross-border evidence, confidentiality and your circumstances with you and the whistleblower lawyers your case needs.
An eligible individual must voluntarily provide original information that leads to a successful SEC enforcement action ordering more than $1 million in monetary sanctions. The SEC’s eligibility explanation also makes clear that you need not be an employee of the company. A contractor, consultant or competitor’s employee may have information that matters.
For an SEC whistleblower award, original information can come from your own knowledge or analysis that reveals something not generally known. The useful contribution might connect a named intermediary, a particular sale and the instruction behind the payment. We work with you to establish what you know, how you know it and what it adds.
A March 2019 working paper hosted by MIT Sloan, Do Corporate Whistleblower Laws Deter Accounting Fraud?, found that exposure to state False Claims Acts reduced the likelihood of accounting fraud by 5% to 9%. It studied companies held by state pension funds as states adopted those laws.
Bring your questions about anonymous reporting to our whistleblower experts. We address confidentiality with you and FCPA whistleblower counsel from the first conversation, alongside the payment or accounting conduct you want to discuss. That conversation also covers your workplace concerns, including those arising from work outside the United States.
Start with our whistleblower experts and your account of the payments, approvals or false entries. We assess the whistleblower program that fits your information and bring in FCPA whistleblower lawyers who understand the transactions and companies involved.
The SEC identifies bribery and improper payments to foreign officials among the conduct it investigates. Its FAQ emphasizes specific transactions, people involved and nonpublic material that shows the conduct. You may know the instruction behind one invoice or why a customer received different terms from those management approved. That is a concrete starting point for our conversation.
The SEC does not require internal reporting to consider someone for an award. If you have already raised the concern, we examine the internal report and the company’s response with you, including who received it and what happened afterward.
The SEC’s order against Anheuser-Busch InBev described an internal complaint about a promoter and potential FCPA problems. According to the order, the company accelerated an audit that left the promoter’s work unexamined:
This audit did not scrutinize Promoter Company A’s activities or expenses.
SEC administrative order, In the Matter of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, paragraph 12.
We see the obvious question: how does an audit answer a complaint when it leaves out the subject of the complaint? The original warning and the audit’s scope belong together when we examine what management knew and what it chose to investigate.
Compliance and audit staff can qualify for SEC awards, with their responsibilities and how they obtained the information requiring individual assessment. They may know which concerns reached management, which transactions the review covered and which recommendations remained open. An approval trail, diligence file or earlier version of an investigation report can connect the payment to the company’s response. Your account helps us understand that history and select the whistleblower counsel it needs.
Yes. Information about an existing investigation can support SEC award eligibility when it significantly contributes to the success of the enforcement action. The SEC also recognizes information that leads investigators to pursue a new line of inquiry.
A particular transaction, an instruction or a person who can explain the arrangement can add substance to what is already known. We assess that contribution with you, including the connection between your information and the conduct under investigation.
Questions about your own part in the conduct, a possible award or a non-prosecution agreement belong in a conversation with our whistleblower experts and FCPA whistleblower counsel. Tell us about the payments you handled, the approvals you gave and the instructions you received. We work through those questions with you as part of assessing the case.
An SEC tip and a later award application are separate submissions. The award claim concerns the enforcement action and the contribution your information made to it.
That distinction is part of the work we do with you and your whistleblower lawyers. We connect the initial account, the information added along the way and the resulting enforcement action, and address the claim requirements and milestones that follow with you.
An SEC whistleblower reward can be 10% to 30% of monetary sanctions collected in a qualifying enforcement action. The SEC’s FAQ says certain related actions based on the same information can also count, including a Justice Department deferred prosecution agreement. The important money is the qualifying collection, rather than a percentage applied to a company’s headline settlement.
The Justice Department’s corporate whistleblower awards pilot uses a different calculation. Its terms revised July 30, 2026 provide discretionary awards tied to more than $1 million in net proceeds from forfeited assets. We assess the available programs together so the reward question follows the actual payments and your contribution.
Yes. FCPA enforcement continued after the 2025 pause. The February 10, 2025 executive order directed a pause and review of the Justice Department’s enforcement, followed by new enforcement guidelines on June 9, 2025. On July 17, 2026, the Justice Department announced a deferred prosecution agreement with agricultural supply chain company Scoular.
In its announcement of Scoular’s deferred prosecution agreement in the criminal case, the Justice Department described customs brokers bribing Mexican officials to get Scoular’s trains across the border. The brokers invoiced the payments back as reinspection fees, and employees discussed shipments and bribes through WhatsApp and other communications. The invoice supplied the business label. The messages explained what the fee bought.
No. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act does not let you bring a private suit under that law. Whistleblower rewards come through agency enforcement and the applicable award program.
A separate whistleblower case under the False Claims Act can pay 15% to 30% of what the government recovers for fraud against government funds. That is a different law and a different route. We assess which program fits the transactions you know and the money involved.
Tell us what records you know about and how they relate to the payment before deciding what to share. Useful FCPA whistleblower evidence can include intermediary agreements, invoices, approvals, ledgers, messages, hiring or hospitality records, and internal warnings. We address questions about access with you and your whistleblower counsel.
The departments involved may hold different parts of the same transaction. Sales knows what the customer paid and why a discount was requested. Finance knows who received the money and which account carried it. Compliance may know that the intermediary’s background or the payment’s purpose had already been questioned. Connecting those accounts explains how the transaction reached the books.
Earlier versions can matter too. In Walmart’s permit-payment inquiry, the SEC’s order alleged that a final report omitted a payment reference contained in earlier versions concerning an intermediary accused of corruption. The company’s account of a concern belongs beside the original warning. Someone inside may know what was removed and who made that decision.
If you can explain the fee, approval or internal warning behind the paperwork, speak with our whistleblower experts about the transaction. We work with you to build your strongest foreign bribery whistleblower case, bring in FCPA whistleblower lawyers with the expertise it requires, and stay with you through the whole journey.