Contents
Contents
The FCPA whistleblower award application deadline under the SEC program is 90 calendar days after the relevant Notice of Covered Action. Reporting the bribery and claiming the reward are separate acts. If you supplied the payment records, explained the disguised commission or helped investigators understand the business, the award claim is where that contribution connects to the government’s result.
No. An SEC tip supplies information about possible wrongdoing. Form WB-APP is the separate application for a whistleblower award. The SEC’s explanation of award claims distinguishes the initial report, the public notice and the later decision about the whistleblower’s contribution.
Foreign bribery can lead to SEC enforcement as well as a Justice Department case. The SEC whistleblower program rewards qualifying information about securities violations, including improper payments to foreign officials. The Justice Department’s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program has its own claim process.
The SEC program also reaches beyond the company’s employees. An outsider can qualify, and overseas residence does not by itself defeat eligibility for an award tied to a qualifying U.S. enforcement action. We work through the connection between your information, the company and the agency’s action with you, including questions about anonymity where they matter to your claim.
An SEC Notice of Covered Action starts the award-claim period when the agency posts an enforcement action exceeding $1 million in monetary sanctions. The notice concerns the government’s action against the company or other defendants. It does not decide which whistleblower qualifies or what that person contributed.
The SEC may contact a whistleblower or whistleblower counsel who worked with its investigators as a courtesy. Its public notice remains the trigger. We track the award notice with you and the FCPA whistleblower lawyers we bring in. Our work connects the earlier reporting and assistance to the later claim.
An award claim connects what you supplied to what the SEC accomplished. Information can start an investigation, reopen one, identify a new line of inquiry or significantly contribute to an investigation already underway. The agency’s own explanation gives useful information room to matter even after investigators have begun their work.
That connection can be very specific. A finance employee may understand the approval behind a payment, while a distributor employee knows the difference between the supplier’s discount and the price charged to the customer. A government-facing agent may know what the commission was supposed to buy. Those are different views of the same transaction, and the information’s value lies in what it helps investigators establish.
A May 2021 SEC award order awarded more than $28 million after information led to an investigation in one country and company reporting about another region. The order recognized the contribution while examining its connection to the final charges. We focus on that connection: the records, explanations and assistance that moved the investigation forward.
TIGO Guatemala’s criminal deferred prosecution agreement shows why an insider’s explanation can matter. Under that agreement, the company admitted a bribery scheme involving a law that shifted telecommunications infrastructure approvals from municipalities to the national government. Its admitted statement of facts describes the commercial payoff:
TIGO Guatemala enjoyed an unfair commercial advantage over competitors because it was able to rapidly seek authorization to build out significant telecommunications infrastructure without seeking the approval of the municipalities.
The company also admitted using an inflated contract to generate money for bribes. We see a bribe fund dressed up as an ordinary contract. For someone who understands the contract or the approval process, explaining that connection can give investigators something the invoice alone does not reveal.
The SEC related action award application deadline depends on when the other authority’s final order arrives in relation to the SEC claim. A related action with a final sanctions order already entered when the SEC application is made belongs with that application. A later final sanctions order starts its own 90-calendar-day claim period. These are separate events even when both agencies investigated the same payments.
A related action can extend an SEC award to qualifying enforcement by another authority, including the Justice Department. Eligibility for the SEC covered-action award comes first, and the same information must have led to the related action. The SEC recognizes that deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements can qualify for this purpose.
The SEC does not post notices for actions brought by other agencies. We track those actions with you and FCPA whistleblower counsel, alongside the SEC notice.
Another agency’s reward program adds a further question about which program applies. We bring FCPA whistleblower lawyers into that assessment with you, matching the actual resolutions to your contribution instead of treating every government announcement as another reward.
The SEC whistleblower preliminary determination appeal deadline depends on which decision you received. We identify the decision and its timetable with the FCPA whistleblower lawyers we bring in, and connect the agency’s reasoning to the evidence of your contribution.
If your question concerns a late SEC whistleblower award application or extraordinary circumstances, bring that question to us with the notice and the history of your reporting. We review the circumstances with you and FCPA whistleblower counsel, including what the agency actually sent and when.
The Justice Department’s pilot has a separate 90-calendar-day award-claim period after publication of a successful-forfeiture notice. Its July 30, 2026 program terms tie that clock to the department’s own publication.
The department’s submission and award process separates the initial tip from the later notice, claim and award determination. We work through that claim with you and FCPA whistleblower lawyers, connecting your information to the case the department resolved.
The July revision also changed how the pilot treats eligibility under another whistleblower program. Eligibility elsewhere alone no longer automatically excludes a whistleblower, while the program prohibits duplicate awards for the same or substantially the same misconduct. The terms say that the policies in effect on the submission date govern the evaluation. We examine that history with the relevant program documents, because an older description of the pilot can give a different answer.
SEC awards use qualifying collected sanctions, with an aggregate award range of 10% to 30% for eligible whistleblowers. We examine the government’s recovery alongside your contribution, so the claim tells the full story of what your information helped accomplish.
A whistleblower case under the False Claims Act can pay 15% to 30% of what the government recovers. That is a separate route addressing fraud in government programs.
There is a reason to take the reward seriously alongside the enforcement. A 2019 working paper available through MIT Sloan, Do Corporate Whistleblower Laws Deter Accounting Fraud?, found lower accounting-fraud likelihood among firms exposed to state False Claims Acts through pension-fund ownership. It also found a stronger response to the SEC program among firms not previously exposed to those state laws. The study supports the value of making useful insider information worth bringing forward.
If you know about foreign bribery or have already reported it, speak to one of our Whistleblower Experts about what your information can show. We connect your knowledge of the business to the case, bring in FCPA whistleblower lawyers who understand award claims and stay beside you from the first report through the claim.