To decide how to report hospice fraud, talk with our whistleblower experts about what you saw, who directed it and what Medicare was billed. A nurse may know that a patient’s improvement disappeared from the chart. A biller may know that the claimed physician visit never happened. Your account can connect the care at the bedside to the version the hospice used to get paid.
A hospice fraud case can begin with that difference. We work with hospice insiders to connect patient episodes, management instructions and payments, and bring in hospice fraud whistleblower lawyers who understand the business. You can start the conversation with the part you know.
Useful evidence connects the patient’s condition and care to the certification, the claim and the people who directed what happened. We want to understand which hospice and location you worked with, your role, when the conduct occurred and how you learned about it. What you observed yourself, what a colleague reported and what the documents say each contribute something different.
The records come from different parts of the business. These are the connections we examine with you:
| Part of the Hospice’s Work | What the Records Can Show |
|---|---|
| Admission and clinical notes | The patient’s condition, the information the physician received, later chart changes and who requested them. |
| Admissions and census targets | Bonus formulas, census reports and instructions connecting enrollment or delayed discharge to financial targets. |
| Visits and billed care | Service dates, nursing notes, staffing and hours beside the billed routine, continuous home care or general inpatient level. |
| Referrals and compensation | Agreements, stated duties, invoices, stipends and bonuses alongside the patients referred and the timing of payments. |
Your account also includes concerns you raised, who heard them and what happened afterward.
Hospice eligibility fraud can involve changing the information behind a physician’s certification. Medicare’s hospice benefit requires a prognosis of six months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The benefit provides comfort-focused care for the terminal illness in place of care designed to cure it.
In its complaint announcement about Creekside Hospice, the Justice Department alleged that staff were discouraged from documenting known improvements in patients’ health. It also alleged that employees changed records after claims had been submitted and made personal physician visits appear to have occurred when they had not. The cases came from a clinical manager and a former clinical manager.
An insider can explain the gap between the original observation and the later entry. The date matters because the visit, certification and claim may already have happened by the time someone asks for a change. We examine that sequence with you, including any audit request that prompted another version of the chart.
Admissions targets and bonus plans can connect management’s financial goals to decisions about individual patients. Good Shepherd Hospice settled allegations that it billed for ineligible patients. The Department of Justice described pressure to meet admissions and census targets, with enrollment-based bonuses reaching marketers, admissions nurses and executive directors. The incentive reached the people deciding who came in.
The government’s complaint against Evercare Hospice captured a similar collision between the census and a patient’s departure:
But, according to the medical record, Evercare management directed “we are not to revoke this patient because ‘our census is too low.’”
The reason given in that entry was the census. Someone inside can explain who made the decision, what the patient wanted and which instructions reached the clinical team. The election or revocation paperwork, the account of that conversation and the subsequent billing give the instruction its context.
Hospice billing fraud can turn on the difference between the care delivered and the care claimed. Routine home care pays by the enrolled day. Continuous home care and general inpatient care carry different payment rules tied to the care needed and supplied.
That payment structure also explains why referral setting matters. In Medicare Hospices Have Financial Incentives to Provide Care in Assisted Living Facilities, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General study from January 2015 analyzed Medicare hospice claims from 2007 through 2012. It found that hospices typically provided fewer than five hours of visits per week while receiving about $1,100 per week for each routine home care beneficiary in assisted living. The Inspector General raised concerns about incentives to target patients and settings offering the greatest financial gain.
The insider can connect that business incentive to actual decisions: where patients came from, what care they needed and how staffing was assigned.
The civil settlement involving Home Care Hospice resolved allegations of fabricated records supporting crisis care that was unnecessary or never provided. That is a concrete comparison for a nurse or biller: the symptoms recorded, the work performed and the care level charged to Medicare.
Hospice referral kickbacks can be paid through a medical director’s compensation. Tapestry Hospice settled a case brought by a former employee who alleged that medical directors received monthly stipends and a signing bonus in return for referrals. DOJ said compensation allegedly rose with referrals and fell when referrals stopped.
The agreement states the work the hospice says it bought. The duties actually performed, payment history and referral records show what happened. Someone in finance or marketing may know why the stipend changed and which patient referrals preceded it.
An internal warning can connect a clinical concern to a later decision about billing or keeping Medicare’s money. In the government’s allegations against Curo Health Services over care at Avalon Hospice, physicians did not receive or adequately consider complete and accurate patient information. The government also alleged that internal complaints and audits identified ineligible patients, yet the providers kept Medicare and Medicaid payments.
The Avalon allegations became part of Gentiva’s broader settlement in 2024. For an insider, the connection runs from the concern to the people who received it and the payments that followed. A nurse’s objection, an audit finding and management’s response can explain why the same billing continued.
We work through patient confidentiality with you and hospice fraud whistleblower counsel as part of assessing the records behind your account. The initial conversation can focus on what you observed, which records exist and where they are held. Questions about access to patient files or sharing material belong in that conversation, with the details of your role and the information involved.
Speak with our whistleblower experts about the false Medicare claims your account may reveal and the reporting route that fits your case. An OIG hospice fraud report gives an agency information. A qui tam lawsuit is a civil case brought on the government’s behalf under the False Claims Act. We assess that choice with you and hospice fraud whistleblower lawyers.
A whistleblower case under the False Claims Act can pay 15% to 30% of what the government recovers.
Evercare shows the value of a specific account. The court’s award order describes whistleblowers supplying a review of denied Medicare claims, examples of continued billing despite denials, and patient information connecting certifications to diagnoses and physician visits. They also supplied witness lists and emails. Evercare agreed to an $18 million settlement, and the court awarded the whistleblowers $3.6 million.
Those employees could explain both the claims and the policies behind them. We build that connection with you from the knowledge you bring, whether it concerns a clinical decision, a billing instruction or a referral payment.
For a hospice nurse, retaliation concerns about reporting Medicare fraud are a reason to speak with us about the circumstances of your case. We work through those concerns with you and hospice fraud whistleblower counsel. The same applies if you are wondering how to report hospice fraud anonymously or have questions about an earlier report.
If you took part in the admissions, documentation or billing you are questioning, we discuss that history with you too. Your first conversation can cover the conduct and the concerns you have about coming forward.
If you know why a patient stayed enrolled, why a chart changed or what a referral payment bought, speak to one of our whistleblower experts. Our whistleblower experts help build your strongest case around the patients, payments and decisions you know, and bring in hospice fraud whistleblower lawyers with the experience your evidence calls for. We stay beside you through the case and the pursuit of your share of the recovery.