Contents
Contents
Skilled nursing facility fraud involves knowingly seeking government payment through false bills, assessments or other records. Taxpayers fund the bill, and residents live with the care behind it. The therapy log may show treatment nobody delivered. The assessment may describe a resident who needs far more help than the staff actually provide. If you know who changed that account, or who insisted it stay that way, you may know the part of a whistleblower case the bill alone cannot show.
Yes. A facility can face a False Claims Act case for knowingly submitting false claims or causing them to be submitted. Responsibility can also reach the therapy contractor, manager or other business that directed the false information behind the payment.
The question reaches beyond the person who pressed submit. Who set the treatment target? Who changed the assessment? Who received a clinical objection and told staff to keep billing? Those decisions connect the company’s knowledge to the money it sought.
Healthcare fraud in a skilled nursing facility can involve unnecessary therapy, invented treatment, false staffing records, paid referrals or unauthorized coverage changes:
The records differ with the scheme. A treatment log shows what was billed as therapy. A director’s contract and referral history show what the facility was buying. An enrollment record shows how the payer changed.
Nursing home fraud evidence connects the care, the representation and the payment. Clinical notes describe the resident. Assessments and certifications describe the need for services. Claims and payment records show what the program was asked to fund. Internal instructions can explain why those accounts disagree.
For an assessment concern, we connect the original and changed Minimum Data Set assessment entries to the clinical record, the resulting HIPPS billing code and the paid claim. For therapy, the therapist’s notes, treatment logs and billing records let us examine the same resident on the same dates. For referrals, contracts, payments and admissions show the business relationship behind the patient flow.
A nurse may know the care actually delivered. A therapy manager may know who imposed the minutes. A billing employee may see the changed code. Your account gives those records a history: who made the decision, what they were told and what happened afterward.
Start with what you personally know: the practice you saw, who directed it and the records that could explain it. We assess that account with you and identify the connections a case needs. Questions about patient information or company documents belong in that conversation with our whistleblower experts and the whistleblower lawyers we bring in.
A red flag for health care fraud is a contradiction between the care staff describe and the account used to obtain payment. A treatment record changed to meet a target, an unsupported diagnosis or a discharge delayed to keep billing gives the concern a specific shape.
The government’s Life Care complaint alleged that an internal instruction put a billing category ahead of a therapist’s judgment:
For example, in an April 2007 memorandum, the Rehab Manager at Life Care Center of Inverrary instructed her rehabilitation staff: “do not change (decrease) the minutes that are planned out in the PPS book when a patient is in an assessment. The minutes have been planned to meet a certain RUG category by a certain date.”
Government’s allegation, United States of America v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., complaint, paragraph 113.
The category had been chosen. The therapist was being told to keep the minutes that would produce it. That is why a scheduling instruction can matter as much as the final bill.
The difficulty depends on how clearly the evidence connects the care to a false bill. We assess what the government was told, why it mattered to payment and what the people controlling that account knew.
For a case involving poor care, the resident’s treatment records and the facility’s billing need to be read together. In SavaSeniorCare’s case, the government alleged that the company delayed discharges after residents were medically ready to leave. The clinical judgment about discharge and the later claims identify the payment question directly.
If your question is how hard it is to win, bring us the facts you know. We assess the strength of that connection and the expertise your case needs.
Medicare Part A skilled nursing facility billing starts with an eligible stay and a documented need for skilled care. The assessment then determines the payment classification. Hospital records, physician orders, certifications and dates each have a part in establishing the covered stay.
Under the ordinary rule, the qualifying hospital stay requires at least three consecutive inpatient days, excluding the discharge day. Observation time does not count toward those inpatient days.
Admission and needed skilled care ordinarily begin within 30 calendar days after hospital discharge, and Part A covers up to 100 days per benefit period while coverage requirements are met. Skilled care requires professional skill, including when complications make otherwise routine services skilled. It can be covered to maintain a resident’s capabilities or prevent deterioration. The dates and clinical notes explain why the facility claimed a covered stay.
The Patient Driven Payment Model replaced RUG-IV for covered Part A stays on October 1, 2019. Patient characteristics and clinical needs became the basis for classification in place of the old therapy-minute groups.
An MDS and PDPM fraud concern therefore follows the assessment inputs: diagnosis, usual function, nursing needs, speech-language factors and nontherapy ancillary conditions or services. The clinical record has to support the input, and the input has to be traced to the payment it produced. The Life Care instruction illustrates the older system.
The documentation must support the resident’s actual condition, skilled need, services and assessment entries used for payment. The path from MDS to HIPPS to payment connects bedside observations to the classification on the claim.
Section GG records usual self-care and mobility performance. A changed assistance score needs to be read beside the observations supporting it and the payment group it generated. Diagnosis support, swallowing records, nursing notes and treatment records answer different parts of the same assessment. We examine the version used for the claim and the people who supplied or changed it.
Yes, for excluded services such as physicians’ professional services. Consolidated billing puts therapy, drugs and supplies within the facility’s covered Part A payment. Medicare pays the facility, which pays its outside suppliers under their contracts.
After Part A coverage ends, medically necessary therapy may remain payable under Part B, with the facility still responsible for consolidated therapy billing.
Yes. Medicare Advantage adds the plan’s authorization and contract terms to the clinical record. Hospice coverage can put a service inside a different benefit.
In a duplicate therapy billing concern involving hospice, the hospice coverage dates and the separately billed service need to meet in the same account. With unauthorized enrollment changes, the consent and enrollment records explain how the facility obtained access to a different payer.
Staffing records can show whether reported hours match paid work. Payroll-Based Journal submissions can be compared with time records, payroll and agency documentation for the same worker and day. The resident census and care notes help explain what work those hours were supposed to support.
In its June 2026 staffing audit, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General found reported hours that nurses had not worked, meal breaks left in the totals and hours for training when nurses were unavailable for their primary role.
For a whistleblower case, we examine who prepared or approved the information, what they knew and how the representation affected payment or continued participation in the program.
Yes. Responsibility can follow control of the false claim beyond the facility that submitted it. In the Kindred and RehabCare resolution, the government alleged that the therapy supplier caused false facility claims. Separate settlements reached customers that allegedly failed to prevent the practices.
Ownership and payment records can explain another part of the business. The facility receives care payments, the property company receives rent and a management company receives fees. When those companies share owners, an expense at the facility can be income elsewhere in the same enterprise. Following those payments helps locate who controlled and benefited from the arrangement.
An insider who knows who approved a contract or directed a transfer can connect companies that appear separately in the accounts.
The price of an outside service can also buy access to residents. The government alleged that Omnicare used below-cost facility pharmacy contracts to obtain separately reimbursable beneficiary business. The facility got the discount; the pharmacy got the business. The contract and the prescriptions explain what changed hands.
Start with our whistleblower experts and the care, billing or financial practice you know. A nursing home qui tam case seeks recovery for the government under the False Claims Act. We assess the evidence with you and find nursing home fraud whistleblower lawyers with the experience your case calls for.
If you have already raised the concern internally or reported it elsewhere, tell us that history too. We handle the questions about earlier reports, confidentiality and your own role as part of developing the case with you.
Talk with our whistleblower experts about confidentiality from the first conversation. We address your circumstances with you and the whistleblower lawyers handling your case.
Bring questions about retaliation and your position at work into the same conversation. We work through those concerns with you alongside the billing case.
A whistleblower case under the False Claims Act can pay 15% to 30% of what the government recovers.
The Justice Department announced a combined $29 million whistleblower award in Life Care’s $145 million settlement. The agreement ties the whistleblowers’ share to payments the government receives.
The government payments at issue and the evidence supporting their recovery drive the assessment. We examine the affected claims, the conduct behind them and your contribution to the case.
Speak with our whistleblower experts about the suspected billing and what you know firsthand. We assess the potential False Claims Act case and work with you on the reporting decision.
If you are a resident or family member concerned about inflated claims, tell us which services or dates conflict with what you observed. If you work inside the facility or a contractor, your account may explain who created the records and why. We bring that knowledge together with the payment evidence.
If you have seen treatment targets become chart entries, staffing hours appear without the work or contracts buy admissions, talk to our whistleblower experts about the practice you know. We build the case around that knowledge, bring in skilled nursing facility fraud whistleblower lawyers and stand with you through the pursuit of a recovery and your share.