Contents
If you want to report tax fraud anonymously and receive an IRS whistleblower reward, start with our whistleblower experts so we can address identity and reward questions with you. You may know where the income went, why the payroll deposits stopped or who controls an offshore account. We take the concern about your name as seriously as the information you can bring to the tax claim.
An IRS whistleblower seeking an award must identify themselves to the IRS on a signed Form 211. That makes an award claim different from an anonymous tax tip. Confidentiality concerns protecting your identity from the taxpayer and others; anonymity in Tax Court is a separate question for the court. We work through IRS whistleblower anonymity with you and bring in tax fraud whistleblower lawyers for the legal questions your situation raises.
If your concern is whether the taxpayer learns your identity, that belongs at the beginning of our work together. We consider your role, your relationship to the taxpayer and how the information came to you.
Your job title can help explain what you know. The IRS award rules provide awards to individuals, and the program does not require a particular occupation. We start with the facts you can explain and assess the eligibility questions with you.
Useful IRS whistleblower evidence connects a taxpayer, the transactions, the relevant tax periods and the source of your knowledge. We look at your supporting records, how and when you learned the facts and your relationship to the taxpayer, the same questions the IRS claim guidance raises.
A payment record can show where money went. Your knowledge of the business can explain what the payment was for, who directed it and how it reached the accounts used to prepare a return. We examine those connections with you, including the difference between what you personally observed and what the documents show.
The evidence discussion also reaches records outside your possession. The award rules recognize information about where supporting documents can be found. Knowing which part of the business holds a transaction history can help us understand the evidence available for a claim. Questions about access are matters we handle with you and tax fraud whistleblower lawyers.
A tax return shows what the taxpayer reported. The transactions behind it can tell a fuller story, and an insider may know which records connect the money to that return. We look at the business process that produced the figures, from the original payment to the information passed to the preparer.
Payroll makes the distinction concrete. An employer calculates withholding, reports employment taxes and deposits the money. Under the IRS guidance on outsourcing payroll duties, using an ordinary payroll service generally leaves the employer responsible for its tax obligations. The debit from the employer’s account and the deposit to the Treasury are different parts of that payment trail.
For someone who sees payroll funding and payment instructions, the important connection may be between money withdrawn for taxes and the deposits actually made. We examine the authorization, the movement of the money and the tax records together. A payroll report describes a calculation. The deposit record answers where the money went.
For business income, customer payments and original transaction records can explain receipts that a summary ledger leaves out. A ledger and a return can agree because both used the same incomplete information. We want to understand what reached the preparer and what the underlying payment records show.
Offshore accounts present another version of the same problem. Ownership evidence and transaction histories can connect an account’s formal holder to the person who actually controls it. Someone who understands that arrangement may supply the explanation missing from the account label. We examine the ownership and the money together.
Insider knowledge can reveal an arrangement that the reported figures alone leave obscure. In Not Just Whistling Dixie: The Case for Tax Whistleblowers in the States, published in Villanova Law Review in 2014, the analysis identifies control over information as a central tax-enforcement problem. Reported transactions can still leave tax authorities without the facts that reveal an abusive arrangement.
Whistleblowers can close the information gap by bringing to light complex and hidden interpretations of the law, turning them over to tax officials for investigation, and allowing dispute resolution procedures and the judicial process to “settle” unsettled areas of the law.
Not Just Whistling Dixie: The Case for Tax Whistleblowers in the States, Villanova Law Review, 2014
The article argues that whistleblowers can narrow that information gap. Its discussion of state tax enforcement explains why people who understand complex transactions can add something an outside reviewer lacks. For us, that is a reason to take the insider’s explanation seriously alongside the documents.
Your contribution may be the connection between the transaction, the person controlling it and the tax treatment it received. We see the absurdity in letting the people who designed the arrangement write the whole story.
A qualifying IRS whistleblower award pays 15% to 30% of collected proceeds attributable to the whistleblower’s information. We examine how the facts you know connect to a tax underpayment and to money the IRS can recover.
Collected proceeds can include unpaid taxes, penalties and interest. For offshore matters, the IRS award manual also directs analysts to check related FBAR collections for foreign bank account reporting violations.
The mandatory award program applies when proceeds in dispute exceed $2 million. When the taxpayer is an individual, that person’s gross income must also exceed $200,000 in at least one relevant tax year. These are questions we assess against the transactions and tax periods you know.
The IRS rules on contribution recognize information that helps initiate, expand or continue an action producing collections. The useful connection is to the particular tax issue your information helps establish. A clear explanation of the transactions and their supporting records gives us the basis for evaluating that connection with you.
A whistleblower case under the False Claims Act can pay 15% to 30% of what the government recovers. Federal tax underpayments instead belong to the IRS award program described here, where the IRS controls the tax examination and collection. We evaluate your evidence under the program that applies to it.
If you understand the transactions and want your identity concerns taken seriously, speak to one of our whistleblower experts about how the tax went unpaid. We connect your knowledge to the unpaid tax and bring in tax fraud whistleblower lawyers whose experience fits the issues. We stay beside you to build and pursue your strongest IRS whistleblower claim.