Genesis Potomac Center: How One Resident’s Care Became a Federal Settlement

Whistleblower Justice Network

In the Genesis Potomac Center fraud case, Genesis HealthCare LLC agreed to pay $600,000 to resolve allegations of deficient resident care and false claims at its Arlington, Virginia nursing facility. The government’s account centered on one resident: care recorded in the medical chart that employees allegedly failed to provide, and standing physician orders they allegedly failed to follow.

The Department of Justice announced the False Claims Act settlement on December 23, 2015.

Care Recorded, Care Ordered, Care Missing

The Potomac Center allegations concerned care from August 21 through September 24, 2008. The alleged gap hurt the resident who needed the care and taxpayers funding the facility’s services. A chart describing care that never reached the resident can conceal the failure from the people paying for the service.

The Justice Department’s announcement emphasized nursing home residents’ reliance on Medicare and Medicaid for essential health care. Virginia’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit took part in the investigation. The government connected the missed care to allegations that Genesis submitted false federal claims for its operation of Potomac Center.

How the Care Record Gets Built

A care case like Potomac’s crosses roles: bedside observations feed resident assessments, while orders, clinical notes and certifications support the facility’s account of its services.

The person who sees a missed treatment may be different from the person completing an assessment or submitting a bill. We connect the bedside account with the clinical entries, the people responsible for them and the claim sent for payment. The question is whether the facility’s account of its services matches the work its staff actually performed.

A separate government complaint against HCR ManorCare shows how specific that discrepancy can be. The government alleged that false documentation concealed missed care, including this account of a resident’s tracheostomy tube:

Another resident’s tracheostomy tube should have been cleaned daily. One staff member noted that a resident with a tracheotomy tube had not been changed in days, despite documentation falsely reflecting that it had been changed. The tube was crusted over and filled with mucus.

Government’s allegation, United States, et al., ex rel. Compton v. HCR ManorCare, Inc., et al., complaint in intervention, paragraph 488

The physical condition and the chart told opposing stories. That allegation illustrates why the staff member who saw the resident can contribute something the billing record alone cannot.

When Staffing Decisions Reach the Care Record

The same HCR ManorCare complaint connects missed care with management decisions about staffing. The government alleged that an administrator regularly told subordinates not to report to work when their attendance would push the facility over its staffing budget. It also alleged that bonus policies discouraged using agency nurses to cover shortages. The people setting the budget could shape what happened at the bedside without writing a resident’s chart.

The complaint described another gap between the facility’s appearance and its daily operation: staff allegedly increased during state inspections and dropped back to inadequate levels afterward. For an employee working the ordinary shifts, the inspection-day picture could be very different from the care residents usually received.

A missed treatment can point beyond the employee assigned to deliver it. Our work with an insider includes the decisions behind missed care and the facility’s account of it. A manager who controlled staffing and an employee who saw missed treatments may hold different parts of that account.

The One-Year Transition Consultant

Genesis also agreed to pay for a one-year transition consultant to assist Potomac Center’s new operator. The Justice Department said the consultant had been helping identify risks and opportunities to improve skilled nursing services for residents.

In Golden Living’s wound-care settlement announced in January 2013, GGNSC Holdings, operating under the Golden Living name, agreed to pay $613,300. The government alleged inadequate wound monitoring, documentation, prevention and treatment that produced false Medicare, Medicaid and Veterans Administration claims. An integrity agreement and an independent monitor accompanied that settlement.

The Golden Living monitoring agreement covered six Atlanta-area facilities, extending beyond the two homes whose wound care the government challenged. The corrective work therefore reached further into the company’s care operation than the specific allegations resolved by the payment.

Both settlements connected care and its documentation to public payment, then added work inside the nursing-home operation.

A Separate Genesis Settlement in 2017

Genesis’s 2017 settlement package was a different resolution, covering six lawsuits and investigations involving businesses it had acquired. That $53.6 million package combined allegations about skilled nursing therapy, hospice eligibility, outpatient therapy and care.

What Evidence Is Needed to Prove Fraud?

For a nursing home healthcare fraud case, the evidence connects what the resident needed and received with what the facility recorded and billed. We examine the relationship between the care plan, physician orders, clinical notes, assessments and claims, including who knew about or controlled the disputed information.

A bedside employee may know that a recorded activity never happened. Someone involved in an assessment may know which clinical entries supported it. A billing employee may know which claim carried the representation to the payer. Each account becomes more useful when it can be connected to the same resident, care period and payment.

Staffing schedules, time records and agency contracts can help explain who was responsible for the work. The clinical and billing records show how the facility described its services. Our role is to build those connections with you, including the decisions behind the entries, so that the case addresses the conduct and the government’s payment together.

A whistleblower case under the False Claims Act can pay 15% to 30% of what the government recovers. Your knowledge of the care and its documentation is where that conversation with our whistleblower experts begins.

You Know the Care Behind the Chart

If you saw care entered as completed while residents went without it, talk with our whistleblower experts about what happened inside the facility. We work alongside you to build the case from the care, the records and the payment, and bring in nursing home fraud whistleblower lawyers who understand clinical documentation. We remain your partners through the pursuit of the government’s recovery.

WHISTLEBLOWER JUSTICE NETWORK CAN HELP YOU
Make a difference.
Whistleblower Justice NetworkReport Fraud
100% CONFIDENTIALFREE CONSULTATION24 / 7 / 365